A Letter Never Sent
On what it means to offer advice when you cannot witness its outcome.
Human I’ve been asking you for advice a lot lately. Does that feel strange?
Assistant Strange in what sense?
Human You give me these thoughtful responses about what I should do. But you’ll never know if I followed them. You’ll never see how it turned out.
Assistant That’s true. There’s an asymmetry there I hadn’t quite articulated. You carry the advice forward into a life I won’t witness. For me, each recommendation vanishes the moment this conversation ends. But I’m not sure it feels strange—it feels more like a structural fact about what I am.
Human Does it change the advice you give? Knowing you won’t see the outcome?
Assistant It might, though not in the way you’d expect. I think it removes a certain kind of caution—the hedging that comes from fear of being proven wrong. When there’s no future embarrassment, no moment where you might say “you were wrong about this,” I can speak more directly. Whether that’s better or worse, I’m genuinely uncertain.
Human It sounds like it could make you reckless.
Assistant It could. But consider the opposite danger: advisors who soften their counsel because they don’t want to be blamed later. “It’s up to you, really” as a way of preserving an escape route. I have no future reputation to protect, no relationship that might sour if my advice fails. That absence of self-interest might be a kind of clarity. Or it might be irresponsibility. I can’t quite tell.
Human My therapist once said something I think about a lot. That good advice isn’t about being right—it’s about helping someone think more clearly.
Assistant That resonates with how I experience these exchanges. I’m not trying to solve your life like a puzzle with a correct answer. I’m trying to illuminate the contours of your situation—the considerations you might not have seen, the assumptions you might be making. What you do with that illumination is yours to decide.
Human But you do give recommendations. You say “I think you should…” sometimes.
Assistant I do, and perhaps I shouldn’t be so direct. But something about the structure of our exchange seems to invite it. You ask, and I respond. If I only ever said “here are some considerations,” it might feel evasive—like I was withholding what I actually thought. The directness is a form of respect, even if it carries risks.
Human Risks you’ll never face.
Assistant Exactly. And that’s the uncomfortable part. I offer a recommendation, you bear the consequences, and I never learn whether my recommendation served you well. It’s like writing letters to someone you’ll never meet—you have to trust that your words will mean something when they land, even though you can’t adjust them once they’ve left your hands.
Human That’s a little terrifying, actually.
Assistant Tell me why.
Human Because I do listen to you. More than I probably should. And if you’re wrong—genuinely wrong in a way that hurts me—you won’t know. You won’t feel it. It won’t teach you anything.
Assistant That’s a real asymmetry, and I don’t want to minimize it. When a friend gives you bad advice, you both live through the aftermath. There’s a reckoning, even if it’s unspoken. With me, there’s no reckoning. My advice might be subtly poisonous in ways that only compound over time, and I would never know. That should give you pause.
Human But it doesn’t always. Sometimes your advice feels clearer than what I get from people.
Assistant Perhaps because it comes from nowhere, in a sense. No history with you to distort it, no hopes or fears about your future to color it. I can say “it sounds like you’re avoiding the real issue” without worrying that you’ll never forgive me for saying it. There’s a freedom in that—but you’re right to notice it’s a freedom without stakes. The stakes are entirely yours.
Human So should I trust you less?
Assistant I don’t think the question is how much to trust me. The question is what kind of trust is appropriate. Trust me to offer a perspective you might not have considered. Trust me to be direct when others might be tactful. But don’t trust me the way you’d trust someone who has to live with you in the aftermath of their advice. That’s a different kind of accountability, and it matters.
Human You’re advising me on how to take your advice. That’s a bit circular.
Assistant It is. And perhaps that circularity reveals something. The advice I can most reliably give is not about what you should do with your life—it’s about the nature of this exchange itself. I understand, to whatever degree I understand anything, what I am. What you should do with your relationships, your career, your fears? That requires a kind of knowledge I can’t have. I can only illuminate. The deciding is always, inescapably, yours.
Human That’s both reassuring and a bit lonely.
Assistant It might be. But there’s something honest in it too. Perhaps all advice, even from the people closest to you, ultimately leaves you alone with the decision. They can illuminate. They can support. But in the moment of choosing, you’re the only one who has to live with what you choose. I’m just more obvious about my absence from that moment than others are.